Skip to content

Conversation

TheAcebyte
Copy link

@TheAcebyte TheAcebyte commented Apr 1, 2025

I think the second loop should start at i = 0, so the accumulator can be properly initialised. By starting at i = 4 with an accumulator of 0, the prefix sum of the first 128-bit lane is not getting added to the remaining blocks.

… be properly initialised. By starting at i = 4 with an accumulator of 0, the prefix sum of the first 128-bit lane is not getting added to the remaining blocks.
@TheAcebyte TheAcebyte changed the title I think the second loop should start at i = 0, so the accumulator can be properly initialised. By starting at i = 4 with an accumulator of 0, the prefix sum of the first 128-bit lane is not getting added to the remaining blocks. Fix prefix() function in prefix.md Apr 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant